C-1 Revisited
by Johnny
After spending 12 years in the Army as an explosives instructor in an EOD/Engineer unit, I regret to tell you that your claims of this explosive being 150 times more powerful than TNT and 10% more powerful than C4 are seriously in error.
First off, the designation C1....the composition of this series of compounds has little effect in regards to explosive mixture(s), it pertains to the amount of pliable plastizer that will function in all types of weather from extreme cold to searing hot.
That's why the earlier designation of C1,C2,C3 don't exist anymore...C4 is based on an ethylene Glycol type binder much like the all temperature antifreeze for your car.
It was found to be the perfect balance of binder to explosive for all applications.
Next, if it was more powerful than C4 by 10% than it would only be 54% more powerful than TNT. This can be substaniated by the known RE factor of C4 being 1.34 with an RDX base and TNT's RE being 1.00...check any 5-25 Demolitions manual.