View Full Version : Instead of trying to make cars greener...
Why don't we just mass kill all the cows as they fart out a lot of methane? This would reduce the level of greenhouses gases a fair bit.
On the downside we wouldn't have decent milk or steak or beef...
hankletank
2008-01-30, 18:40
That would raise the prices of basic necessities imagine all the foods which have beef and dairy in them going up several dollars. What could help is to make farmers accountable for their cow's shit/farting and make them do something about it.
Or eat less meat, up until really the industrial and green revolutions meat was not eaten almost everyday.
But then ask what is easier? Making cars more efficient or killing the world cows, which in many places are being grazed on land which would in any other circumstance not be used for agriculture.
Mellow_Fellow
2008-02-01, 22:29
Or we could get people off their apathetic, lazy-arse-wanker car-seats, and onto buses, trains, share-cars.... anything really. Shit, i'm willing to make the sacrifice of having to listen to the Jeremy Clarksons of this world moaning the fuck on about "the good ol' days of zooming through puddles at 80 and wetting some shitty hippy with my glorious motor!" even.
Food production and transportation are indeed a waste of resources, but I think reducing the impact of travel - including in the air, is a very real step which could be taken in most developed societies. Cut the bullshit, the state needs to control transport (ie, GTFO National Rail...) and make it effective, safe, cheap (even free?) and available to the vast majority of the population.
No one has a "right" to live in a society, and yet toodle around in their SUV listening to Barry Manilow or whatever. It'd be great if this came at no cost, (except to those with decent music taste... ;)) but it aint so... :(
EtherFreak
2008-02-07, 03:52
DUMBFUCK! animals for thousands of years have put out methane gas.
now if people did not drive their cars as much, trains and light rail became more frequently used there would be a greener planet. also we could be using nuclear power plants more.
Prometheus
2008-02-08, 18:15
Strap collectors to their assholes, and then burn the methane for fuel.
On a more serious note. Lab grown meat will put an end to the live food animal industry. We can grow it now, but it's expensive and only half of people that eat it can keep it down. But it will get better.
Mellow_Fellow
2008-02-09, 02:08
Strap collectors to their assholes, and then burn the methane for fuel.
On a more serious note. Lab grown meat will put an end to the live food animal industry. We can grow it now, but it's expensive and only half of people that eat it can keep it down. But it will get better.
.......Could just eat less meat?
deus-redux
2008-02-09, 10:57
To play devil's advocate for a moment, he has a point, in that we do sustain vast numbers of livestock purely because we like to eat meat.
-deus-
Prometheus
2008-02-10, 16:44
Point. Too many people are gumming up their arteries with fast food burgers, so it would be in their own immediate interest to reduce meat intake anyway.
Like that's gonna happen.
Tacit_Attack
2008-02-10, 17:14
We should look into growing cow flesh in a lab with like stem cells. Then we wouldn't have to deal with all the extra cow parts, and it'd be more humane, as cow flesh by itself isn't sentient, and therefore can't suffer. It'd probably be more economical, too, once we get it down.
Megalodon
2008-02-10, 17:25
Because, that's just retarded.
TheMessiahComplex
2008-02-12, 00:20
Strap collectors to their assholes, and then burn the methane for fuel.
http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/2007/05/california_appr.html
Funny you should mention that.
Or we could get people off their apathetic, lazy-arse-wanker car-seats, and onto buses, trains, share-cars.... anything really.
That's not just an issue of people being lazy, that's also an issue of places having non-existent or horrible mass transit systems. As per example, getting from Newark, NJ to downtown Manhattan (a distance of about 10 miles) on mass transit took me anywhere from one to two hours. Driving takes about 20-45 minutes depending (of course, finding parking in manhattan is another issue entirely and that takes about a day and a half).
how about we just ban the shit that makes McDonalds soooooo popular like fucking putting a store withing .5mi of the other or advertising food sold for under 2$ or the like.
they will go out of buisness faster than EnRoN after the whole money alligation/scandal
Prometheus
2008-02-12, 15:09
We should look into growing cow flesh in a lab with like stem cells. Then we wouldn't have to deal with all the extra cow parts, and it'd be more humane, as cow flesh by itself isn't sentient, and therefore can't suffer. It'd probably be more economical, too, once we get it down.
I thought I just said that.
Here's a semi-humorous article on the subject.
http://discovermagazine.com/2006/jul/blinded
Nagasaki911
2008-02-14, 00:53
http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/2007/05/california_appr.html
Funny you should mention that.
That's not just an issue of people being lazy, that's also an issue of places having non-existent or horrible mass transit systems. As per example, getting from Newark, NJ to downtown Manhattan (a distance of about 10 miles) on mass transit took me anywhere from one to two hours. Driving takes about 20-45 minutes depending (of course, finding parking in manhattan is another issue entirely and that takes about a day and a half).
before i got a car it took me 3 hours to move 12 miles to school on public transportation. I was only able to take the bus home from school. I would have had to get up at four to make it to school and the buses don't run that early.
when i got a car it took me 9 minutes (mostly freeway)
PirateJoe
2008-02-14, 01:28
before i got a car it took me 3 hours to move 12 miles to school on public transportation. I was only able to take the bus home from school. I would have had to get up at four to make it to school and the buses don't run that early.
when i got a car it took me 9 minutes (mostly freeway)
I was just about to post this.
Public transportation blows.
Prometheus
2008-02-14, 12:37
The Detroit metro bus system is actually halfway decent. Ok, the time factor is a bitch, but at least they are clean.
Mellow_Fellow
2008-02-14, 14:59
I was just about to post this.
Public transportation blows.
It's a shame the US public transport system outside of a couple of cities is pretty much geared towards "the poor people" who don't have cars.
Seriously, I think eventually the US is going to have to install a decent public transport system, if oil starts being more of an issue (which it will do....) and other fuels are so economically viable. Trains, trams, coaches and buses might not work so well in the most remote areas, but come on, there's a fair amount of populated areas in America, where if such things were introduced, travel could be cheap, fairly effective and more environmentally friendly.
Sorry guys, but the "dream" of getting 2 chrome plated SUVs with custom rims is one which some people are gona have to snap out of, fairly fast.....
Shit I hope public transport improves in the UK... for a small, wealthy nation, it's ridiculously expensive and badly run, almost everywhere. I guess to me.... it makes sense to cut all the crap about "greener cars".... unless we can remove burning petrol/gas from the equation, makes more sense to focus on people sharing/biking/walking (:eek: ) more...
Galbador
2008-02-17, 12:01
Fuck the planet. Let's live each day as thought it were our last.
boozehound420
2008-02-17, 23:55
or say fuck it and try your best to use up all oil products left on this planet as fast as possible. Force the change that way.
LuKaZz420
2008-02-28, 16:10
Shit I hope public transport improves in the UK... for a small, wealthy nation, it's ridiculously expensive and badly run, almost everywhere.
What? Public transport in London is fantastic, the tube gets you pretty much anywhere in no time, except for the circle line you usually wait less than ten minutes for a train and they're relatively clean.
Buses are great too, a bit overpriced but clean and new, and there's lots of space, in Italy all the buses are dirty and full of gypsies plus you can wait like 45 minutes for them.
I definitely agree about London and maybe a few other big cities but around the rest of the country it is truly crap. Last time I used the bus to go to town (about 2-3 miles drive on the shortest route taking about 10 mins) it was 15 mins late, cost me £3.50 to get their and back and over took almost 40 mins each way. In a car I could do it in 10 minutes each way and for about 35p worth of petrol each way.
Mellow_Fellow
2008-03-02, 17:25
What? Public transport in London is fantastic, the tube gets you pretty much anywhere in no time, except for the circle line you usually wait less than ten minutes for a train and they're relatively clean.
Buses are great too, a bit overpriced but clean and new, and there's lots of space, in Italy all the buses are dirty and full of gypsies plus you can wait like 45 minutes for them.
This is why I said "almost everywhere"...
London IS the exception, and pretty much the only one - the rest of the country suffers from either poor service, high prices, lack of availability, or a combination of the three.
I travelled on trains in Italy, and the underground, and both were pretty good. Seemed fairly good value the train, too. I never tried the pikey-buses, though! :cool:
To take the bus where I live, less than a mile journey, costs £1.10 for a single, and if you travel slightly over a mile that sky rockets to £1.70. Trains are a fucking rip-off, it costs £5 to get a return to the nearest big city (15 min journey) unless you use a rail-card, which you can't use at peak times, anyway. There are frequent delays with the trains almost everywhere.... they're basically crap considering how much you pay. Privatised public transport is massive fail in the U.K really, just shoddy service subsidised by the government, which never really does an effective job.
On the south-west coast of France, it's a flat-rate for buses, you pay 1euro and you can travel up to 20km! The buses are on time, clean, run regularly, and widely used! Pffft. Probably because if transport sucks in France, they have a bloody riot about it, instead of doing nothing but moan, and continuing to use it.... haaa. :o
I guess I just think it's pretty disgraceful that proportionally, our public transport system isn't that widely used. It's just dumb...
Destroy a vital source of food because of a vague rumour that cow adds to the greenhouse affect..?
The whole thing reeks of us humans trying to say "it's not OUR fault we're killing our planet, it's them cows!"
It's sad. :(
Without cows, there would be no shrooms.
Consider that.
Without cows, there would be no shrooms.
Consider that.
Well there would, as not every mushrooms grows on cow shit :rolleyes:
Liberty caps dont, Cyans don't etc.
1. rig up a device to somehow harness the methane they produce
2. FREE COW JENKEM!1
3. ?????
4. Profit.
Mutant Funk Drink
2008-03-23, 23:50
Blaming pollution on cows is just a cop out.
The solution to all pollution is to reduce the human population drastically. We can either just cover up the symptoms like we are doing now, or we can treat the root cause. And if we don't do it, nature will do it for us.
FreedomHippie
2008-04-10, 19:40
Without cows, there would be no shrooms.
Consider that.
Mushrooms grow on a variety of things besides cow shit. And if your talking about magic mushrooms the idea that they come from cow shit is a very stretched out truth. Although magic mushrooms do grow on cow shit, so do hundreds of other kinds. If your looking for magic mushrooms, chances are your going to be growing them yourself under proper circumstances rather than going out in a field and picking through cow shit.
Nagasaki911
2008-04-14, 18:23
talk to china
asdfghasdfgh
2008-04-15, 02:01
Why don't we just mass kill all the cows as they fart out a lot of methane?
Why don't we kill ourselves for polluting 100x more?
What? Public transport in London is fantastic, the tube gets you pretty much anywhere in no time, except for the circle line you usually wait less than ten minutes for a train and they're relatively clean.
Buses are great too, a bit overpriced but clean and new, and there's lots of space, in Italy all the buses are dirty and full of gypsies plus you can wait like 45 minutes for them.
Are you fucking me? The tube is like hell. Going down into a hot, dirty tunnel hundreds of feet from anything resembling air or daylight.
You can't get on it's so busy, the tracks and trains are older than god and haven't been cleaned since they put them in there! And they rattle so hard it's like they're gonna break apart.
Giomanach
2008-04-16, 03:40
Are you fucking me? The tube is like hell. Going down into a hot, dirty tunnel hundred of feet from anything resembling air or daylight.
You can't get on it it's so busy, the tracks and trains are older than god and haven't been cleaned since they put them in there! And they rattle so hard it's like they're gonna break apart.
Also you can get shot in the head multiple times at point-blank range if you try to run to catch your train.
Yep. Swarthy-looking men use at your own risk... :(
almightyares
2008-04-18, 21:28
OP is a total dickweed.
HandOfZek
2008-04-24, 18:10
How hard is it to make green paint?
TheGreenDoctor
2008-05-04, 02:46
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k113/Mark_Taylor87/Car%20Pictures/109_2171.jpg
No cat converter, open air breather system, and smog delete. But its still green!!!!! and exempt :D
telecomnerd
2008-05-10, 16:22
^ It probably pollutes less in the long run than some hybrid that craps out at 100 000 miles.
I ride my bike to work 4.5 miles each way, it's faster than transit.
krazy_white_kid
2008-05-15, 03:11
Is this a troll thread? God fucking damn people get more retarded by the day...
"LoLlZ LyKe LeTz KiLl T3H KoWz AnD ThErE wOnT bE GlObAl WaRmInG LOLOLOLOLOLOL"
yeah, because cows don't have the right to be alive, simply because they shit and fart. You're so fucking stupid.
Have you ever seen the movie "idiocracy"? Well, you should. You'd be shocked at how much it resembles the world we live in.
rodrat16
2008-05-17, 17:53
That would raise the prices of basic necessities imagine all the foods which have beef and dairy in them going up several dollars. What could help is to make farmers accountable for their cow's shit/farting and make them do something about it.
how can you be held accountable to how many times an animal passes gas?
Visceral Ethereal Carpet
2008-05-18, 06:54
Why don't we just mass kill all the cows as they fart out a lot of methane? This would reduce the level of greenhouses gases a fair bit.
What could help is to make farmers accountable for their cow's shit/farting and make them do something about it.
thats easy to say when you are a city dwelling piece of shit kid who thinks his food comes from the back room of a fucking supermarket.
believe it or not, not all farmers are stupid rednecks who dont care about their natural footprint. the vast majority just dont have the money (or to put it more realistically, lack of debt), to change the entire infrastructure of their property and business.
Yes, stopping the farming of ruminating (ones that produce a shitload of methane) animals would be better for more reasons that just methane reduction, but there is no way that it would ever happen without a shitload of financial incentive.
or we could all just start growing our own food...
thats easy to say when you are a city dwelling piece of shit kid who thinks his food comes from the back room of a fucking supermarket.
Lol, I live about 200 metres away from a cow field.
Visceral Ethereal Carpet
2008-05-19, 09:12
Lol, I live about 200 metres away from a cow field.
holy shit, youre practically a farmer.
apparently having such a close connection to a rural environment has really given you the solutions to all of our problems. thankyou.
wolfy_9005
2008-05-23, 10:37
heres a better idea. destroy china and india and we wont have to worry about pollution.
simple.
wolfy_9005
2008-05-23, 10:38
Lol, I live about 200 metres away from a cow field.
yeh, it's called high school
Mellow_Fellow
2008-05-23, 14:03
The hindus would be very upset, over here...
TheGreenDoctor
2008-05-23, 15:22
heres a better idea. destroy china and india and we wont have to worry about pollution.
simple.
yea, plus, if we can get most of their civilian population culled 75% or more, that takes away a large amount of demand for oil, and the price will go down. We're really better off without China. The quality of the goods they produce is poor, not to mention child slave labor was used to make.
If we destroy china, the whole world is better off. Every vehicle that was being driven and every factory would of been destroyed so no pollution.
Also, if china were gone, national security would be much safer because they could finally start coping with the illegal mexican problem more thoroughly due to freed up resources here.
With no supplier, walmart would either raise its prices 3 fold or go out of business due to no cheap chink labor. Same deal with all the big chain stores. Which will hopefully bring in some smaller businesses again.
http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/263
needtoknow
2008-06-04, 00:51
Is this a troll thread? God fucking damn people get more retarded by the day...
"LoLlZ LyKe LeTz KiLl T3H KoWz AnD ThErE wOnT bE GlObAl WaRmInG LOLOLOLOLOLOL"
yeah, because cows don't have the right to be alive, simply because they shit and fart. You're so fucking stupid.
Have you ever seen the movie "idiocracy"? Well, you should. You'd be shocked at how much it resembles the world we live in.
I was shocked. I was walking in safeway today and I saw gatorade "10% more electrolyts"
Why don't we just mass kill all the cows as they fart out a lot of methane? This would reduce the level of greenhouses gases a fair bit.
On the downside we wouldn't have decent milk or steak or beef...
Wow, dude, you're fucking brilliant.
Kudos, seriously.
You should work for NASA.
ViperX202
2008-06-21, 04:26
DUMBFUCK! animals for thousands of years have put out methane gas.
now if people did not drive their cars as much, trains and light rail became more frequently used there would be a greener planet. also we could be using nuclear power plants more.
nuclear power is a trainwreck waiting to derail...
NiGhT PrOwLeR
2008-06-21, 18:57
no, the cows can live,
but a real solution is to COLONIZE THE FUCKING MOON!!
technology is getting there,
or perhaps mars, we could live up thar,
Visceral Ethereal Carpet
2008-06-22, 06:44
nuclear power is a trainwreck waiting to derail...
as is every other form of non-renewable energy.
it should not be a debate whether to use nuclear or not.
the debate should be over whether to use nuclear or coal.
renewables cant do shit to supply enough power. we need to choose the lesser of two evils - nuclear.
woopsueypigs77
2008-06-25, 00:08
Or eat less meat, up until really the industrial and green revolutions meat was not eaten almost everyday.
But then ask what is easier? Making cars more efficient or killing the world cows, which in many places are being grazed on land which would in any other circumstance not be used for agriculture.
Proof?
Proof?
Generally by the lower classes of course, the upper classes in many cases ate a diet almost entirely composed of meat because it was a sign of wealth and helped you show of.
There has been a good TV series related to this where 2 people go back for a week and live (hence eat) as people from different times (Medieval, Tudor, Elizabethan etc...). They generally live as fairly rich people hence eat lots of meat but they do sometimes visit what the poorer people and hence what most of the population eats and it is generally not meat, usually pottage which is a kind of stew of vegetables and grains.
Even during the last 100 years the per capita meat consumption has risen dramatically
http://www.hsus.org/farm/resources/pubs/stats_meat_consumption.html
And I can't provide an exact source as it was in a article I was reading a while ago but it said in late 17th C England 50% of the population could afford but didn't necessarily eat meat everyday, 30% could afford it 2-3 times a week and the remaining 20% only could of afforded it once a week if at all. The reason is just cost which is a reflection of the large amount of other food it takes to produce a piece of meat.
With the advent of mechanised farming using cheap fossil fuel energy inputs yield per unit area was greatly increased
meaning more food and land could be devoted to raising livestock.
To play devil's advocate for a moment, he has a point, in that we do sustain vast numbers of livestock purely because we like to eat meat.
-deus-
Because many people would be in ill health were it not for the high protein of meat, especially people with a high metabolism, simply eating vegetables wouldnt sustain them.
Because many people would be in ill health were it not for the high protein of meat, especially people with a high metabolism, simply eating vegetables wouldnt sustain them.
Sure, but there is a difference between eating enough protein to keep you alive and eating lots of meat.
Also there is a difference between using land to keep animals on which otherwise it would be unsuitable for agriculture and growing grains to feed animals.
As well many of these industrially made 'meats' are not exactly the healthiest foods around leading to lots of ill health eg. Obesity.
GatorWarrior
2008-07-05, 05:16
Fuck the planet. Let's live each day as thought it were our last.
Agreed!
wolfy_9005
2008-07-09, 09:47
Why dont we just kill all the chinese and indians? theres ~2.3billion people gone.
StoopidN00b
2008-07-10, 06:40
Where killing off all the cows????????
YES!!!!! Fuck you rosie o'donald....
Dyke cows are cool right??
lan_rogers_book
2008-07-10, 23:18
Why dont we just kill all the chinese and indians? theres ~2.3billion people gone.
I WAY agree. If we kill the cows we would probably have to kill the indians anyway because of the holy war that would invoke. As for the chinese I never liked the food anyway.
Jest an after thought: Where will the Jews eat on christmas if we kill all the chinese?
you know why? huh? argh!! its because the fucking cars are fucking not made by mother nature. but fucking cows are needed to support the lifecycle of not only humans but other animals that we just happen to eat. Think first you stupid american!
Diamond Domino
2008-07-11, 03:51
We should look into growing cow flesh in a lab with like stem cells. Then we wouldn't have to deal with all the extra cow parts, and it'd be more humane, as cow flesh by itself isn't sentient, and therefore can't suffer. It'd probably be more economical, too, once we get it down.
While lab grown meat sounds like a viable idea, its actually nigh impossible to perfectly replicate all of the things that are in meat: muscle, fats, certain textures, and the amount thereof, that make meat taste like it does. So far all we have achieved is tasteless mush with the consistency of applesauce grown in thin sheets on a shelf, or beads. So I guess we're stuck with cows for now.
BTW, don't you know hybrid cars are the leading cause of smug? ;)
Ed Lister
2008-07-12, 12:26
Mushrooms grow on a variety of things besides cow shit. And if your talking about magic mushrooms the idea that they come from cow shit is a very stretched out truth. Although magic mushrooms do grow on cow shit, so do hundreds of other kinds. If your looking for magic mushrooms, chances are your going to be growing them yourself under proper circumstances rather than going out in a field and picking through cow shit.
I beg to differ. Around here anyway. Noone grows fucking shrooms. You wait for the first rains to come and go and then head down to the South West country and basically choose a place to pull over, walk out and pick as many magic mushrooms as you want. It's great. Australia owns.
unfrgvncure
2008-07-14, 17:09
when I looked at the thread name I had high hopes...
you are NOT funny, get a life
FreedomHippie
2008-07-18, 16:56
I beg to differ. Around here anyway. Noone grows fucking shrooms. You wait for the first rains to come and go and then head down to the South West country and basically choose a place to pull over, walk out and pick as many magic mushrooms as you want. It's great. Australia owns.
In that case your quite lucky. I suppose if you dont die from eating them theres really nothing to complain about. :)
I just get my magic mushrooms posted to me from Holland.
illuminatikiller
2008-07-27, 02:15
DUMBFUCK! animals for thousands of years have put out methane gas.
The whole cattle industry is very destructive to the environment, it's not just the methane. Even if it was just the methane, we have a lot more cows being raised for food than there was in the wild.
eyeluvthe9ds
2008-07-27, 18:49
Is this a troll thread? God fucking damn people get more retarded by the day...
"LoLlZ LyKe LeTz KiLl T3H KoWz AnD ThErE wOnT bE GlObAl WaRmInG LOLOLOLOLOLOL"
yeah, because cows don't have the right to be alive, simply because they shit and fart. You're so fucking stupid.
Have you ever seen the movie "idiocracy"? Well, you should. You'd be shocked at how much it resembles the world we live in.
what we should be doing is giving our crops/livestock electrolytes.
ArmsMerchant
2008-08-25, 19:18
Why don't we just mass kill all the cows as they fart out a lot of methane? This would reduce the level of greenhouses gases a fair bit.
On the downside we wouldn't have decent milk or steak or beef...
I think OP is trying to be cute, but it isn't a bad idea. Americans eat way too much meat anyway, cow's milk isn't all that good for you, and growing cattle is wildly inefficient.
Esplender
2008-08-27, 18:53
Nigger nigger nigger
the beeno man
2008-09-03, 17:39
I ride my bike to work 4.5 miles each way, it's faster than transit.
THIS. if your not going too far. RIDE A FUCKING BIKE. its the most efficient transportation on earth
laundrysoap
2008-09-15, 22:17
Water Powered Cars = Alternative Energy =
Alternative To Oil = Rising Demand In Oil
=
Need To Invade Small Countries For More Oil =
Need To Consider People Of Those Small Countries As Expendable =
Means Killing Those People If It Means Giving Oil To The Important Part Of The World
FreedomHippie
2008-09-16, 03:46
Water Powered Cars = Alternative Energy =
Alternative To Oil = Rising Demand In Oil
=
Need To Invade Small Countries For More Oil =
Need To Consider People Of Those Small Countries As Expendable =
Means Killing Those People If It Means Giving Oil To The Important Part Of The World
Why would the demand for oil increase if we had water powered cars. Common sense would tell me that if we all drove around if cars that ran off of water which is everywhere and free, why would the demand and consequently the price of oil go up? Basic supply and demand, if there is no demand theres not much of a need for a supply.
Anyway, I agree with riding a bike whenever possible. Good for the environment... sure... but more importantly will keep your ass in shape.
Also, you have to take into account how small of an impact it would be on our use of oil. Perhaps if we got everyone into a hydrocar it may be a good start, but dont forget about petrol-products which is a hell of a lot of things.
PlentyofTorrents.com
2008-09-24, 09:23
We should build rivers where roads are and float to work on wind power. :rolleyes:
Captain Douche
2008-10-12, 02:41
Splendid idea. Slaughter other creatures instead of adapting tools we created that are destroying our habitat.
Well, I guess if we've been doing it for the last 300 years, why not continue.
furious_G
2008-10-14, 18:21
why don't we trade all our cars in for cows instead?
why don't we trade all our cars in for cows instead?
Holy shit, why didn't I think of this.
Cows instead of cars... I might create a protest group and do demonstrations in London and shiz.
"COWS NOT CARS". Get everyone riding everywhere on cows. And fields instead of carparks. And grass instead of petrol.
DAMMITJIM
2008-10-15, 07:15
Sheep farts have cause major problems in Sweden.
Barns are exploding everywhere.
They are actually giving pills to farting sheep to prevent injury or fire.
60-70% of the methane in that country comes from farm animal flatulations.
I say, run a hose from the sheep's ass to the carburetor and drive all day.
Or stick a bottle up his ass and save that stuff...or something.
wolfy_9005
2008-10-23, 09:38
And what do you propose to do with the millions of cow bodies?
Wont you think they'd decompose, and since it's at the same time there'll be a massive increase of the gasses and we'll all die
Ed Lister
2008-10-28, 03:35
And what do you propose to do with the millions of cow bodies?
Steak for every fucking meal. Duh.
Steak for every fucking meal. Duh.
Fuck yea.