Log in

View Full Version : Essay Competition For My Local Newspaper


Tetrahydrocannabinol
2008-10-01, 06:37
I am pretty sure this is the proper forum for this thread, if it isn't I apologize as I only recently came back to totse and would appreciate a mod moving it to the correct forum. Anyways... my local newspaper for New Hampshire is having an essay competition. The essay topic is your stance on making voting a law in the United States, like they recently (or maybe a while ago) did in Australia. There will be one winner from grades 5-8 and one winner grades 9-12. The essay requirements are that it must be postmarked by October 1st (I am bringing it to the post office tomorrow) and that the essay does not exceed 300 words. My original essay was well over 800 words, and still felt way to short to accurately explain my stance, opinions, and solutions. Slimming it down to 300 words was quite the task, took me over 4 hours but I got it done. One of my best talents is my use of complex sentence phrasing (as my teacher puts it) use of vocabulary, and very detailed explanation of whatever point I am trying to get across to the reader. What I mean by that is that I try to write the essay so that anyone can understand it, no matter the depth of the subject and despite the vocabulary I choose and the complexity of the sentences. Without those tools I was down to the basics, and that is having a good opinion and idea, I didn't have many words left which I could use to "spice it up" a bit, so its pretty much the meat and potatoes, if you know what I'm trying to say. Anyways here is the essay, I want to make any last minute changes that could increase my chances of winning, if you have anything I could add or take out, words you think would fit better, grammatical errors, etc, please point them out as it will be greatly appreciated. Keep in mind it is exactly 300 words, so if you have ideas, make sure it would actually be possible for me to include them, I am sure I could remove a few things to include any new ideas, but only to a small extent. Anyways here it is, comments, criticisms, opinions, ideas, catching any mistakes and all that other stuff I mentioned are greatly appreciated, keep in mind the use of I and me in essays is never recommended. Thanks, and again if this is the wrong forum or if there is a better one I apologize, and would ask that a mod please move this to that forum or location.

Note: This is somewhat a long thread, going by essay standards it is quite short, but going by internet forum thread standards its a bit long, could be boring, could be interesting, depending on your interests and what not.

Another Note: I guess totse doesn't allow paragraphing, maybe its just not working for some reason, I don't know, so each new paragraph will be marked with two hyphens ( -- ) before it.

Voting as a Law in the United States

-- What makes democracy so great is the freedom to choose who will represent us. It is important that every American is properly represented, and with some recent lackluster voter turnouts, making a “voting law” as they do in Australia seems logical.
-- Though it’s true we need to increase turnouts, simply making voting a law could lead to disastrous results in a nation already in disaster, and violates our freedom not to vote. However, creating citizens active in their government is vital in preserving the ideals of democracy.
-- The truth is, if a law requiring citizens of age to vote, many young voters would choose a name on the ballot with little or no knowledge of the candidates. Remember the next voters are from the hip-hop, glamour, and MTV generation, some couldn’t even name the Republican nominee, months after his last opponent dropped out.
-- The importance lies in producing educated, voter ready citizens before they become of legal voting age. This is just as vital to being a functioning member of society as the knowledge of mathematics and grammar.
-- Our government should stress the importance of voting to its younger generation by including this in our educational system starting early from middle school and going all the way through high school. The goal is to produce a child that, by the time they are of voting age, will be excited to vote, rather then forced by a law. Parents, as well as schools, should do their part in making sure their children understand the importance of exercising this freedom, and doing so properly. A law need not do this for us.
-- The outcome will hopefully be a generation of competent young voters. Our children will grow up, eager to participate in their communities and governments and our wonderful country will prosper.

Lewcifer
2008-10-02, 22:42
I realise that the deadline has passed, but as this a discussion forum and not a homework help forum, I'm sure you'd love to continue the debate ;).

Do you think there is a contradiction in having the State "educating" children about contemporary politics? In my view it's better to teach kids about it in the historical sense, and leave them apply what they know to modern day politics. If after learning of the struggle to obtain Universal suffrage and of the miscarriages of justice which can take place when citizens are alienated from politics they are still apathetic about voting, then so be it.

Also, what do mean by prosperity? I you're talking in terms of GNP, does prosperity necessarily come from an educated public participating in politics? Or is the opposite true? Corporate lobbyists in Washington look after corporate interests, and their influence is far greater than the general publics'. If the ordinary man had a bigger voice relative to the corporate voice, GNP would surely suffer, although the benefits of the wealth created would be shared more equally among the populace (*Gasp/shock/horror* horrible lefty socialism).

In reference to your "MTV generation" point, how bigger role does the media have to play? If you're keen on freedom to choose and freedom of speech, how do you ensure the media outlets which influence younger people display more current events and politics related items?

Tetrahydrocannabinol
2008-10-03, 21:30
I pretty much thought no one would respond, anyways...

Historical politics, nope, of course some kids can take something away from that class, but the majority won't. Just like learning about Shakespeare in literature, no one cares, he died 400 or whatever years ago. It is important to teach the historical side of civics/literature/science and all that, but when it comes to just preparing someone to vote, I think we need someone much different.

Of course lobbyists are incredibly influential, and they look out for corporate interests. In turn they buy candidates and all that other corrupt stuff we hear about, but what if we decided just to not vote for those candidates. If we were able to look deeper, we would see neither candidate in this race is prepared to deal with the future. In fact no president in the past few elections was prepared, except Al Gore, crazy as he seems, at least he sees the environmental crisis. Environment falls apart = conditions on Earth worsen = eventually non-life supporting = no human race at all. That's of course just the surface...

As for prosperity, I mean prosperity in general, gross domestic product, employment, affordable non-environment damaging energy, just an overall better United States with happier citizens. Not to mention a United States that might raise its concerns above Paris Hilton's dress at the Emmy awards. Free Speech, sure, and that means the media can say whatever it wants, even the stuff it knows is polluting our citizens minds, just so they can profit. But if we can educate our citizens to see through this, the media will have to cater to different interests. Its okay to pop open a people magazine when your waiting in line at the grocery store just out of boredom, but this lifestyle is consuming people's lives, which yields a materialistic society that is literally conditioned to be unable to look for anything deeper then the surface of their people magazine and MTV... a lotta' crazy talk yeah, but there's some truth to it.

I never claimed to have all the answers or be the "perfect citizen" I just know I've found some sort of problem with the world and its a serious one. Not that you accused me, just thought it was worth noting.

Anyways I guess it all starts with the people we put in charge of our country. Sure they can't tell the media to kill the rap culture and shut down MTV, but they can institute better forms of education and promote awareness about things that actually matter, (of course its all in opinion about "things that matter")

So at the end of the day, I believe it could be a start, but really the human species will never live up to its potential or survive for the amount of years unintelligent life forms have survived for with anything short of a world wide dictatorship like you see in sci fi movies and books... Again, crazy, but accurate. If whoever is leading us, in the white house, as our governor, or dictator of the world, really loves the human race and wants to see it succeed, and we can produce a generation of people who are aware of this as well, they will support this leader and give him the power to do the right things that need to be done for our species to stop looking so damn pathetic.

Yeah, unlikely, crazy talk, radical utopianism, whatever you wanna call it.

I can only dream...