Your Rights as A Juror
by FIJA
Your Rights As a Juror
The Grassroots Party FIJA (Fully Informed Jury Association)
So, you thought you would help the cause by going out and
registering to vote on election day. You've been patting yourself on
the back ever since,until the day you got called up for jury duty.
Now you're asking yourself, why in the world did you do it?
Nobody wants to serve juror duty, right? I mean, you may actually
have to send someone to jail, or something worse, and regardless of
the charges, you'll be aiding and abetting our unfair justice system.
Right?
Wrong! This may be the best opportunity you'll ever get to directly
make a difference. Jurors not only have the duty to decide guilt or
innocence, but also the "equity", or "inequity", of the law for which
the defendant is accused. This means you have the RIGHT to acquit
a defendant based upon YOUR ideas of right and wrong, fairness,
and your own conscience. If you feel that the laws against
marijuana possession are unjust and unfair, and you are summoned
for jury duty to determine the fate of someone accused of
possession, then it is your RIGHT to vote for acquittal, regardless
of the judge's instructions.
The very first jury trial before the U.S. Supreme Court Chief
Justice John Jay instructed the jury this way:
"It is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is on the
other hand, presumed that courts are the best judges of law. But
still both objects are within your power of decision... you have a
right to take it upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine
the law as well as the fact in controversy". State of Georgia vs.
Brailsford (3 Dall 1)
This jury right was first put to the test as early as 1734, and has
been upheld by a Federal Appeals Court as recently as 1972, where
it was defined as an:
"... unreviewable and unreversible power... to acquit in disregard of
the instructions on the law given by the trial judge..." (US vs
Dougherty, 473 F 2d 1113, 1139 (1972)
Another case in 1969 states the following:
" We recognize, as appellants urge the undisputed power of the jury
to acquit, even if it's verdict is contrary to the law as given by the
judge, and contrary to the evidence. This is a power that must exist
as long as we adhere to the general verdict in criminal cases, for the
courts cannot search the minds of the jurors to find the basis upon
which they judge.
If the jury feels that the laws under which the defendant is accused
are unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified their logic of
passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide
by that decision" (US vs Moylan, 4177 F2d 1002, 1006 (1969)
Because a jury's guilty verdict must be unanimous, it takes only
ONE vote to effectively NULLIFY an unjust law. Regardless of
legislative intent, or a judge's instructions to the jury, YOU, not the
court, will make the decision to acquit. Though you may only be
causing a "hung" jury, and it won't be a true acquittal, at least the
defendant will NOT be convicted of violating an unjust or
unconstitutional law. Very often, defendants are not retried by the
government, due to the high cost involved, and you will be sending
a very clear and powerful message.
The government will not be able to deprive this person of their
LIBERTY without YOUR consent! If you feel the statute is unfair,
unconstitutional or infringes on the defendants God-given rights, it
is not only your right to vote for acquittal, but your DUTY. Do not
be intimidated by the other jurors, but at the same time respect the
fact that they also may, in good conscience, disagree with your view
point. Explain to them that it is your right to vote either way you
wish, and that you are doing so because you TRULY BELIEVE
that this law is UNJUST. Do not try to come across as some
radical, hell-bent on total anarchy. Take your responsibility
seriously, and there may be a chance that you can sway some of the
other jurors to vote for acquittal as well. Remember to use this
power only to help overturn UNJUST law, not to rebel against the
government. It will do no one any good if you "hang" the jury of
someone accused of murder where there was ample evidence to
convict. Murder is a crime where laws are obviously required, and
stiff sentences are usually warranted. The Grassroots Party does
NOT advocate anarchy. We believe in the Constitution and the Bill
of Rights, and so should you. We need to be even more patriotic
than the average citizen, and take pride in our form of government.
If we work together, we can return government to the way it was
meant to be. Serve proudly when called for jury duty, and vote to
overturn unjust laws. DON'T GIVE IN TO PRESSURE! NULLIFY
UNJUST LAWS!
Some of you may have served on jury duty, and don't remember
being told that you can judge both the law and the facts. Well, the
truth is, they don't HAVE to tell you. In fact, what they tell you
may sound like just the opposite. The courts have ruled that jurors
have the right to decide law but they do not have to be told they
have that right. This was found to be legal as far back as 1895, and
as recently as 1972, in the Dougherty decision mentioned above:
"The fact that there is widespread existence of the jury's prerogative
and approval of its existence as a necessary counter to case
hardened judges and arbitrary prosecutors, does not establish as an
imperative that the jury must be informed by the judge of that
power."
In the case of Sparf vs. US (156 US 51) the court ruled that though
juries have the right to ignore a judges instructions on the law, they
don't have to be made aware that they have that right. It is therefore
everyone's responsibility to KNOW their rights! Unfortunately very
few people know, or understand the right they have to nullify
oppressive and/or unconstitutional laws enacted by their
legislature.
Here are the instructions typically given by a judge:
"It becomes my duty as judge to instruct you concerning the law
applicable to this case, and it is your duty as jurors to follow the
law as I shall state it to you. You are to be governed solely by the
evidence introduced in this trial, and the law as stated to you by
me."
Remember, it is your RIGHT, as affirmed by the Supreme Court
and many lesser federal courts, to bring in a verdict according to
conscience, and to judge whether the law itself is unjust, or unfairly
applied. So the next time you are summoned for jury duty,
remember, if you manage to talk your way out of serving, it could
be some extremist bigot that serves in your place. Will you be able
to sleep at night knowing that you let a person who's only "crime"
was growing a marijuana plant go to jail?
For more information contact:
The Grassroots Party FIJA (Fully Informed Jury Association)<br>
P.O. Box 8011 P.O.<br>
Box 59 St. Paul, MN 55108
If you need additional copies contact the Grassroots Party by
writing to the above address.
Remember to give a copy of this article to anyone you know that is
called up for jury duty! Everyone MUST know their rights if we are
going to overturn unjust laws.
|