The pentacon plane

[SafeAsMilk]

Originally Posted by eXo5

WHAT THE FUCK WHAT ABOUT THE IMPACT INTO A FUCKING STRUCUTRE? CAN YOU NOT THINK ABOUT THE simple fact that hydrocarbons in the fuel tanks and reserves are flammable? and what happens when the sparks come piercing through the walls and you no longer really have a plane. plus there's like 2-4 engines that also go up in smoke and flames when you wreck into something of such magnatude... like wtf? who cares if there's no plane, god damn; you're wasting your time regardless because YOU'RE NEVER GETTING A DEFINITIVE ANSWER.

You do know that jet fuel is essentially kerosene, right? Not too much melting going on in a kerosene fire.

[Retikx]

Originally Posted by whocares123

Eyewitnesses? People in Virginia that physically saw an airplane come down and hit the building? Those driving on the freeway, etc. Air traffic controllers that saw through radar an airplane, identified as flight 77, disappear from the radar? The police and firefighters that cleaned up the scene, they all agreed to not say anything? It just seems so....highly unlikely. Highly.

Occam's razor.

my original post provides one possible explanation

"After countless documentaries and exposes on how its simply impossible to fit a 757 into the hole that was created at the pentagon it is my belief that a scaled down model of a 757 was built and packed with explosives and used. This would explain why witnesses claim to have seen a passenger jet, your average citizen has little to no knowledge about aviation and ground to air distances.

With the us contractors building remote controlled devices like these:

http://www.theuav.com/global_hawk.html

And these are the models that are made public keep in mind.

Another example and this is armature flying.

http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos...ontrolb52.html


To build a half size 757 model jet and pack it with a high explosive warhead would NOT be a difficult task."

[+Casper+]

Originally Posted by Retikx

my original post provides one possible explanation

"After countless documentaries and exposes on how its simply impossible to fit a 757 into the hole that was created at the pentagon it is my belief that a scaled down model of a 757 was built and packed with explosives and used. This would explain why witnesses claim to have seen a passenger jet, your average citizen has little to no knowledge about aviation and ground to air distances.

With the us contractors building remote controlled devices like these:

http://www.theuav.com/global_hawk.html

And these are the models that are made public keep in mind.

Another example and this is armature flying.

http://www.jokeroo.com/extremevideos...ontrolb52.html


To build a half size 757 model jet and pack it with a high explosive warhead would NOT be a difficult task."

But you said a couple posts ago.........

There are certain missile types that are specifically designed to punch holes using a directed warhead. it is shaped in such a way that it gets the maximum forward penetration. and in this particular attack they didn't want to completely destroy the pentagon they only wanted to damage it. Meaning they used a low yeild warhead.

Seriously Retikx, you gota make up your mind here. Which one is it? Global Hawk Plane or a Tomahawk missile? Because right now your making the 757 crashing into the pentagon story look good.