|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
bbs |
search |
rss |
faq |
about |
register
|
 |
 |
digg |
del.icio.us |
sphere |
google
|
 |
|
| Oh the Humanities! Philosophy, Cultural practices, Social norms, Historical Debate, War, and Sociology. |

2008-06-03, 04:20
|
|
|
People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
It's the only thing that makes sense. First off people who have AIDs can't live full lives and they should accept the fact that their lives are finished and allow die in a quick and respectable manner instead of lingering around being all dirty and diseased and slowly wasting away.
The amount of money that we're spending on these dirty adizos is disgusting. It's running up the cost of all our medical care.
And the most concentrated AIDs population is in Africa where they are already overpopulated and can't even afford to feed their people let alone treat them for one of the most expensive and uncurable diseases known to man.
|

2008-06-03, 10:49
|
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
1. HIV suspressors keep HIV harmless. In western countries HIV can stay HIV and not become AIDS with these new drugs. It would be like having astma or something, your just stuck with pills all your life. The fact that Africans are still dieing is because they can' t afford the medicine.
2. If people choose to slowly die in agony because they fucked up in life and got infected, then that is their choice. If they wan' t to end it humanely then that is their choice too. In my perspective if someone got infected by buttfucking one another or sticking a dirty needle in their arm then by all means, suffer.
|

2008-06-03, 21:45
|
|
Regular
|
|
Reading Pa USA
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
How do you justify the constitutionality of this??
|

2008-06-03, 21:46
|
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vazilizaitsev89
How do you justify the constitutionality of this??
|
plenty of the governments policies are unconstitutional but that doesn't stop them.
for the most part though this could just be implemented in Africa where they don't have laws anyway.
|

2008-06-03, 21:47
|
|
Regular
|
|
Basement
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vazilizaitsev89
How do you justify the constitutionality of this??
|
You see a fire, wouldn't you put it out instead of letting it spread?
|

2008-06-03, 22:13
|
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
Maybe those who have HIV or AIDS, and continue to spread it to other people should be killed, but not those who don't. I get the idea kill those who have the disease to kill the infection, but we start doing that where are we going to stop, are we going to kill those who caught the common cold. If we start killing every disease then when a mediocre disease comes along we will have no immunity, do you know how this disease works. Think of it like a battle, an enemy soldier sneaks into your fort, and past your soldiers, he can then make himself appear as though he was one of your soldiers, he can then slowly kill all of your soldiers, anyone goes to look for the enemy he appears as one of yours gets them close enough to kill them too. Now this enemy soldier doesn't stop their he also turns your own soldiers against you. The fact of the matter is that HIV and AIDS are the most sophisticated viruses possible to create. The only way to stop the enemy is to quarentene it, so that it he doesn't kill or infect others. I mean you wouldn't want to kill them all to caught the one enemy soldier.
|

2008-06-03, 22:50
|
|
Regular
|
|
Reading Pa USA
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by irresponsible activist
You see a fire, wouldn't you put it out instead of letting it spread?
|
yes...but fires are not people. Every American citizen is entitled to "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." So I can't say killing them is okay unless they knowingly spread their disease. by which, they could be considered a murderer and then be sent to jail/death penalty
And yes, I know the government does unconstitutional things, but as a person who respects the constitution I like to make sure laws are constitutional
|

2008-06-04, 02:20
|
|
Regular
|
|
Basement
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vazilizaitsev89
yes...but fires are not people. Every American citizen is entitled to "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." So I can't say killing them is okay unless they knowingly spread their disease. by which, they could be considered a murderer and then be sent to jail/death penalty
And yes, I know the government does unconstitutional things, but as a person who respects the constitution I like to make sure laws are constitutional
|
They aren't people in the first place in Africa.
|

2008-06-04, 02:31
|
|
Regular
|
|
Reading Pa USA
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by irresponsible activist
They aren't people in the first place in Africa.
|
well...fuck the africans.
I'm talking about Americans with the disease. After all, Americans are people.
|

2008-06-04, 02:31
|
|
Regular
|
|
Basement
|
|
Re: People with AIDs/HIV should probably be killed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vazilizaitsev89
well...fuck the africans.
I'm talking about Americans with the disease. After all, Americans are people.
|
That is until they get AIDZ
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:24.
|
|
 |

totse.com certificate signatures
|
 |
 |
About | Advertise | Art | Carnality | Community | Contact Us | Copyright Policy | Entertainment | FAQ
Link to totse.com | Science | Search | Society | Submissions | Technology
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|