Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywithaknife
Having said that, I am going to be installing Fedora 10 soon-ish as I have the disk sitting next to me. (Beta)
|
It is recommended that users do not use the preview for anything but that.. a preview, also note that the preview disc or "beta" as you called it is not an exact representation of what is in the official release of Fedora 10, if you are familiar with the rate at which software package updates come from updates-testing to updates when using Fedora after a release has been made, it is 3 times this fast during other stages of Fedora release processes, during the freeze, only critical bugs are fixed however, so anything you may notice in a preview such as application limitations which existed or are now broken or any new bugs, should be just that, either reported to be fixed.. or retested after the final release has been made.
I just wanted to make that noted because the other poster in the EEdora thread, was using something that is Fedora _based_ and I believe EEdora has a different standard of professionalism than Fedora/RedHat when doing releases, but having things like having to use --skip-broken with Yum in EEdora, gives the general public a closer look into what the actual development process is like.. without having to be a contributor such as I, to a major distribution project.
In fact --skip-broken, is an option available for use by developers and maintainers for any reason, and apparently the case in the EEdora thread is one of them.
I would say though with a 1.7GHz processor, any distribution will work fine, users need to know that Linux is much more configurable than Windows ever was or will be, I ran Fedora from Core 1 to Core 6 on dual 350 MHz server boards, with a maximum of 1GB memory a piece, and it ran like butter runs down a pan on a flame.