Fedora 10 Final is here!

[dfgremnantsunleashed]

As most of you already know Fedora 10 is out of beta stages and now its in final form, anyway tried it yet. I am going to put it on download queue and hopefully i will have it in one day.

Release Notes:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10/en_US/

Mirrors:
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/Fedora/10/

Full Info:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=fedora

Waiting for reviews

[coroner]

http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/

Do not use anything but official mirrors, unless you have a SHA1SUM file, you should use this practice for all large downloads.

There are the torrents straight from the project website.

[monkeywithaknife]

And I've been using the beta for so long... Oh well.

*Downloads the torrent from 10-beta*

My AAO runs the beta nicely, I assume it will run just as well on the release version?

And I'm still tossing up whether to run Debian or Fedora on my main laptop. Any suggestions?

[ATG]

I dont get the hype over the new boot. If you want a fast boot, disable the stupid fucking useless boot splash. No matter how optimized it is, it is still useless. Who stares at their screen while it boots anyway?

[monkeywithaknife]

Originally Posted by ATG

I dont get the hype over the new boot. If you want a fast boot, disable the stupid fucking useless boot splash. No matter how optimized it is, it is still useless. Who stares at their screen while it boots anyway?

Windows users. If anything other than a pretty picture comes up they get scared.

[Prometheum]

Originally Posted by monkeywithaknife

Windows users. If anything other than a pretty picture comes up they get scared.

Fortunately, they use windows. Most here, on the other hand, use GNU/Linux.

[coroner]

For the RedHat Graphical Boot "RHGB" all you have to do is modify /etc/grub/grub.conf and remove the "rhgb" line from the kernel string.

It's just a nice looking boot screen. See this is what irks me about you mutherfuckers, it's OK for Ubuntu or EEdora to build worthless shit that never makes it anywhere, but it's not OK for Fedora or RedHat, like the graphical boot screen.

"Oh Windows users only care for that haha lawl"

Ubuntu is a pile of trash period, much less just RedHat's RHGB, so fuck you guys. Keep it coming.

[dfgremnantsunleashed]

Originally Posted by coroner

For the RedHat Graphical Boot "RHGB" all you have to do is modify /etc/grub/grub.conf and remove the "rhgb" line from the kernel string.

It's just a nice looking boot screen. See this is what irks me about you mutherfuckers, it's OK for Ubuntu or EEdora to build worthless shit that never makes it anywhere, but it's not OK for Fedora or RedHat, like the graphical boot screen.

"Oh Windows users only care for that haha lawl"

Ubuntu is a pile of trash period, much less just RedHat's RHGB, so fuck you guys. Keep it coming.

^This, since my system starts very slow, i love to have some sort of boot screen to pass the start up time and it look cool to have a boot screen of Linux.

[Prometheum]

Originally Posted by coroner

Ubuntu is a pile of trash period, much less just RedHat's RHGB, so fuck you guys. Keep it coming.

no u.

[coroner]

Originally Posted by dfgremnantsunleashed

^This, since my system starts very slow, i love to have some sort of boot screen to pass the start up time and it look cool to have a boot screen of Linux.

Dude, don't back up worthwhile attempts at OSS design, the Ubuntu fanbois will not like you for it, especially if it's an OSS project CREATED, WRITTEN AND MAINTAINED solely by one company.

Now, if you want to back up another OSS project that has 4 trillion branches and that has been hacked to pieces by every distribution contributor and thier dogs trying to find some worthwhile use for it whatsoever, then that is fine.. never try to back up a piece of crafty software in Linux by good hearted individuals especially not something as simple as RHGB. Leik plz d00d.