Guide on the Theistic argument

[Rust]

Originally Posted by JesuitArtiste

To say that person has no evidence of what they believe when they clearly believe that they have evidence of what they believe is absurd.

Well, all modern forms of jurisprudence are utterly absurd then because judges don't hear cases because they lack of evidence all the time.

In reality, these people merely claim or believe they have evidence. Until they manage to show how it's evidence, however... If we have to accept their word for it, then we might as well just throw the concept of evidence out the window.