Religion and Science

[Rust]

Originally Posted by countdown2chaos

Besides being stupid in your 2nd part of the post,

What's stupid about wanting you to substantiate that utter nonsense?

Not everything is "energy" in Science. Science does not define "energy" as "everything". It defines it as the capacity to do work.

Not to mention that the phrase you used was "everything is energy, protons, electrons, neutrons" which either means you think everything is all those things at the same time - which is wrong - or that it's one of those things at least - which means you've made a distinction between energy and those particles.

Before you call what I say stupid, read a fucking book.

it takes some practice, don't expect to do it the first time. Its pointless to prove this any other way, one reason it is not working though is doubt, you doubt it will move I'm sure, thought is energy and will keep it there.

Another ridiculous cop-out. You haven't shown that this would work without doubt, much less that doubt would affect it in this way.

We can say the exact same ridiculous and baseless assertions of anything (e.g. "Say 'abracadabra frogitus maximus' and a frog will appear... Oh, but if it doesn't work it means you're doubting it").

Either substantiate your claims or admit that you cannot.