First off, I believe in micro evolution. Each animal adapts to it's environment. However, I do not believe in the macro evolution: Evolve from one common ancestor. Here is why.
There is absolutely no evidence to support evolution and there are too many holes to believe in it without proof. Following are examples. Also check out
www.drdino.com if you have an OPEN mind. if you go one step further and watch his videos, you won't have too many questions.
All I am going to show, is that the galaxy can not be billions of years old. When I have time, I'll add other reasons. First, The moon contains considerable quantities of U-236 and Th-230, both short-lived isotopes that would have been long gone if the moon were billions of years old. Second, Saturn’s rings are still unstable, indicating they are not billions of years old. Another, the existence of great quantities of space dust, which by the Pointing-Robertson effect would have been vacuumed out of our solar system in a few thousand years, indicates the solar system is young. Here's another planetary fact: Jupiter and Saturn are cooling off rather rapidly. They are losing heat twice as fast as they gain it from the sun. They cannot be billions of years old.
Here's some facts from earth:
1. The decaying magnetic field limits earth’s age to less than billions.
2. The volume of lava on earth divided by its rate of efflux gives a number of only a few million years, not billions.
3. Dividing the amount of various minerals in the ocean by their influx rate indicates only a few thousand years of accumulation
4. The amount of Helium 4 in the atmosphere, divided by the formation rate on earth, gives only 175,000 years
5. The erosion rate of the continents is such that they would erode to sea level in less than 14,000,000 years, destroying all old fossils.
6. The rock encasing oil deposits could not withstand the pressure for more than a few thousand years
7. The size of the Mississippi River delta, divided by the rate mud is being deposited, gives an age of less than 30,000 years
www.drdino.com
there are many more. something I remember being taught in highschool that I later found was fals was embrio's having gills. That was proven false in the late 1800's by the university of the man who proposed it. The 'gills' are simply the cochlea and other inner parts of the ear.
Well, I look forward to reading the replies. I apologize if I'm slow replying. I have limited internet access.
Threaded Mode
