Quote:
quote:Originally posted by IanBoyd3:
I want to say something to you now.
You understand things well, and no matter what things I argue with you about on this site, I never want you to change your religion.
You happen to need a God. Fine. As long as you never let your chosen God lead you away from what you know to be right, I am all for it.
By the way, I am curious...what are your beliefs on evolution and gay marriage? You seem more perceptive, honest, and realistic than digi so just wondering.
|
The laws of God are set as a barrier and a filter of sorts. These laws are not designed to govern our lives in this world alone. As you know many people have lived opposed to these commanments but nothing has happened to them. In fact they often seem to prosper. So why the laws of God if they don't appear to have effect in this world?
The laws of God that oppose homosexuality are there (if I dare say it) to preserve heaven. As homosexuality (among other things) is called an abomination. Whether I agree with it or not matters little. If God says these kinds of things will not be in Heaven nor will they enter heaven, then so be it.
It is not really my place to have an opinion. Even if I said God should allow the homosexual into Heaven because I think they are good and loving people deep down inside doesn't matter at all. I have no power to make a judgement of condemnation on others nor do I care to have that kind of power.
It really doesn't matter what my opinion is of the matters of this world. I need to keep focused on how I conduct myself and guard that carefully otherwise I might be doing something that is an abomination before God as well. All sin is a sin no matter if it's stealing, adultry, drunkeness or homosexuality in the eyes of God. His rules, I didn't make it up.
As for evolution, it would be foolish to conclude anything based on so much missing information on both sides. The order of Genesis supports a form of the theory of evolution.
While Gensis doesn't describe mankind coming out of the bloodlines of monkeys and fish, it appears as if all things appeared as the speciies they are with no cross breed mutations. (I have yet to see conclusive evidence that it has really happened likewise)
Genesis does describe how female came out of male. Meaning how we eventually went from a individual being containing both sexes to heterosexual (I don't dare say asexual because there is no evidence MAN reproduced at all prior to being man and woman.) Through the process described in Genesis on the 5th day agrees with some of the cell splitting views of evolution. Meaning how did a cell eventual form into an animal and then reproduce through a male and female gender of the species?
As for plant fossiles predating animals and dinasaur bones predating human bones, the bible is in agreement with the fossile record as it shows how things appeared in the order of Genesis.
Now I realize there are huge holes in all of this technically but the very basics are there.
The thing I still do not accept is cross species mutations as science has yet to show the "missing link". As the science appears now, without presumptions and projected hypothesis, it matches Genesis at the basic levels.
I'm not an enemy to science but the only thing that prevents us from accepting the data we have now as a final truth, is the idea of a missing bridge that enforces the idea of a cross species mutation from a sea dwelling creature to a earth roaming creature.
As it stands, the missing information could just be the proof that this did not happen as things did appear in this world as the species that they are as described in Genesis.
I think that the unproven idea of the "missing link" is what is preventing us from accepting that Gensis is accurate as it does match well with what scientist have solidly proven right now void of presumptions of a missing link.
The bottom line is I think the further science honestly goes into the origins of this planet, we will see more and more of the theories of evolution matching Genesis.
That is my opinion.
[This message has been edited by Interest (edited 04-14-2006).]