Sorry, what's your point?
Are you putting this as an arguemnt for the existance of Christ?
I think it is pretty much widely accepted as fact that Christ did exist, the debate is weather he was actualy a synergy of man and God, or not. There is much more evidence for the existance of christ than there is for many other figures around the same time.
The man has books written about him early on in history, that tell stories by different authors, and yet places and events all fit together. Plus the existance of christianity, and the extreme following in wpite of massive prejudices right after christs lifetime, they all point towards him existing.
Moreover, why wouldn't you believe he existed? If he didn't exist, then someone made him up, and for someone to make the whole story up, and spread it as far as it was spread so fast, he must of been as large a figure as Jesus anyway.
Anyroad, the point is, it's generaly accepted he did exist.
Saying Jesus didn't exist is no different to saying Socrates didn't exist. I mean, no one can really prove you wrong, it happened a long time ago, but, there is so much evidence to suport his being, why doubt it?
|