Quote:
quote:Originally posted by truorion:
If you think about it, maybe the dolphin was an in-between example of how animals developed limbs to climb onto land, not into water.
|
The general scientific consensus is that whales and dolphins share a terrestrial common ancestor, and if I remember correctly, their closest relatives are hippos, with both fossil and molecular evidence supporting this.
If it's the same as in snakes (which I would think it would be, since these genes are relatively highly conserved across the animal kingdom), then the normal lack of hind limbs is due to the lack of expression of the Hox gene Sonic Hedgehog (I'm not joking), among others. Something fucked up in the regulation of these genes during the fetal development of this dolphin in order for it to express hind limbs.
Edit: Thought of something else...
Also, dolphins are mammals. The first animals to emerge on land (besides arthropods) were amphibious, and later reptiles. The fossil record (and I'm pretty sure molecular biology as well) gives direct evidence supporting this, along with the notion that mammals are "younger" than amphibians/reptiles. That, taken with the evidence showing relatedness with animals on land before cetaceans (marine mammals) made it back to the water, gives a pretty compelling case for the ancestors of modern dolphins/whales/porpoises returning to the oceans.
Edit (again): spelling error, goddammit
[This message has been edited by Peanutbutter Soup (edited 11-07-2006).]