Atheism is wrong. With FULL atheist beliefs, you're blind like Christians and Muslims

HeaT · #1 2007-04-11, 02:22

I'm Atheist-Agnostic. Why? I have no fucking clue if there's a god or not. I don't know how this universe works for sure, nobody does, we just have a pretty good guess.

You see, atheism is the belief that there is no god. If you say "I'm totally sure there is no god", you have no real proof..... god has never been DISproven, nor has god been proven.

When I say god, i mean a higher being, or ANYTHING.

So therefore, Atheist-Agnosticism is the only religion of someone who truly believes in science.

Elephantitis Man · #2 2007-04-11, 02:36

Shut up.

+1 post count

Pilsu · #3 2007-04-11, 02:42

Noone's ever disproven Hubbard's work either, be sure to leave room for the Thetans

Twisted_Ferret · #4 2007-04-11, 02:44

This thread gets made at least once a week.

Edit: To explain: To disbelieve in something you see no evidence for requires no faith. Few atheists claim to have to proof that God is nonexistent, though I would agree that they are probably in error if they do; most compare God to Russell's Teapot.

AngryFemme · #5 2007-04-11, 02:47

Well technically, atheism means "Without God" - and it isn't too far of a stretch to imagine that alot of atheists would choose to be "without God", even in the unlikely, near-impossible, highly improbable event that God was proven. Some people just do not subscribe to the idea that holding to a Higher Power is beneficial to their well-being, and some people are quite certain that there is nothing to be experienced after death.

So the entire pudding of it is not made solely with "proof" for some people. I of course am not speaking for all atheists. Just myself.

People can call me an atheist when it's appropriate - but I prefer them to think of me in terms of a non-subscriber, rather than just an unbeliever.

HeaT · #6 2007-04-11, 03:04

I'm just trying to say that Atheist-Agnostic is a much better term, as it implies you're not believing something for sure without proof.

among_the_living · #7 2007-04-11, 03:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by HeaT

I'm just trying to say that Atheist-Agnostic is a much better term, as it implies you're not believing something for sure without proof.

It implies that youre trying to be a smartass.

boozehound420 · #8 2007-04-11, 12:58

Saying your an atheist does not mean you dont leave the possibility of a grand something out there.

I have nothing to base my opinion on something outside of our universe...Yet. For all i know our universe is a lab experiment on some creatures desk in a snow globe type deal. I'm not agnostic to that though, currently i believe there is no limit to our human understandings. It just takes time.

Untill something is proven i wont believe in it.

I am howevor 100% shur the gods layed out in religion are a crock of shit created by primitive man.

So you see I will stick with atheist, untill.........

Punk_Rocker_22 · #9 2007-04-11, 17:14

No one has ever disproven the Flying Spaghetti Monster. If you don't belive that FSMism is possible then you're equally as blind.

---Beany--- · #10 2007-04-11, 17:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Punk_Rocker_22

No one has ever disproven the Flying Spaghetti Monster. If you don't belive that FSMism is possible then you're equally as blind.

I almost miss the invisible pink unicorn.

Anyway, there is nothing at all that points towards flying spaggetti monsters being real, but there are at least things that point towards the possibility of God, but again it depends on your definition of God.