Are we fallible? If so, then we should have no law.

[The Rudeboy]

This mainly goes for American society and the nonpartisan form of the government thereof.

If anyone takes through the claim of the fact that modern law "respects no establishment of religion" and is "non partisan", as in in the law is "secular"(quotations exclude sarcasm), then still considering the fact that no one is omnipotent, why have law?

I only have my small knowledge of my religion to encourage the anarchy of it (idea of no law). Its all of my own thinking and you are in no way required to agree, but here it goes: In Christianity, the rules are good because the infallible Law-Giver made them; you, as a fallible human being shouldn't try to create your own rules because it won't matter we will ignore or break them anyway. Therefore, following the laws of man is in the eyes of mine, irrational. If today's laws aren't from my God, then I shouldn't have to pay attention to them. Yeah, that makes me sound like a crazy. If they are the laws of my God, the they are partisan and in being so null and void for everyone else anyway.

This somehow makes the bureaucracy of waiting at the red light at midnight on an empty road valid. Discordianism is far overlooked in this respect. But I see no conflict in it and the former. (ignoring discordian balance)