Michael Egger Mind Control Lawsuit

by Michael Egger

Michael Egger v. unknown et al

Complaint for Damages

I. Jurisdiction

1. Jurisdiction of this court is attained pursuant to the First, Fifth, Sixth, and Ninth Amendments to the United States Constitution; Bivens v. 6 unknown named agents 403 U.S. 388(1971) 42 U.S.C. 1985(3); Federal Tort Claims Act 28 U.S.C. 2670 et. seq.; and in particular, laws and rulings related to the intentional infliction of emotional duress.

II. Venue

2. Venue in this court is proper under 28 U.S.C 1391(b) and 1391(e) as amended (1986); and in particular, laws and rulings related to the intentional infliction of emotional duress.

III. Parties

3. Plaintiff Michael Egger is (and at all times mentioned therein) a citizen of the United States, currently residing at 7006 Highview Terrace #3, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782.

4. Defendants

Two unknown female maids, employed on August 10, 1984 at:

Hawthorne Hotel, 2134 G Street NW, Washington D.C.

Other persons unknown to Plaintiff, who inspired, encouraged, directed or otherwise conspired with these persons regarding their actions.

IV. Nature of Actions

5. Plaintiff Michael Egger brings this action for monetary, declaratory, and injunctive relief in order to redress injuries suffered as a consequence of deliberate, knowledgeable actions designed to inflict psychological stress and punishment, for the purpose of behavior modification, experimentation and other unknown aims.

V. Factual Background

6. The plaintiff was a resident of the Hawthorne Hotel, 2134 G Street NW, Washington, D.C. from about the last week of August, 1984 to about October 12, 1984. At the time I was writing a lengthy letter which I submitted to various members of the United States Congress on October 7, 1984.

In order to provide some continuity, I am submitting copies of this letter and as well my letter of October 4, 1983 to the Honorable Don Edwards, Chairman of the Subcommittee of Civil and Constitutional Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, United States House of Representatives, my letter of March 6, 1984 to the Honorable Barry Goldwater, Chairman, Select Committee on Intelligence, United States Senate, the letter from the Internal Revenue Service to Senator Goldwater and Senator Goldwater's letter to me. Copies of these letters (except the letter of 10/7/84) are part of Appeals Case 85-5670.

On Monday afternoon, September 10, 1985 I was coming from a shower in a bathroom on the first of the Hawthorne hotel -- to my room, also on the first floor. One of the maids (a somewhat overweight black woman) said to another woman maid (to the best of my memory also black): "Well I don't care if you do or you don't." The other maid said, "She say that sounds like Lennon -- someone who got out of hand."

It is my opinion, that someone directed these persons to "stage" this conversation in order for it to have an emotional impact on me. Specifically, for it to be a "negative conditioning operant" and to evoke fear -- associated with the writing of my report to the U. S. Congress. I don't know this for certain, but this kind of incident had taken place before. This "pattern" of "indirect conversations within my hearing" with a subliminal message is one of my complaints in my reports to the U. S. Congress, and in "Egger v. Casey et al".

On page 11 of my letter of October 4, 1983 I state that Mr. Vern Salazar once said to me regarding the murder of John Lennon that "Some people think the C.I.A. was responsible." I believe it may be true that the phrase "another Lennon who got out of hand" was meant to refer to me, and the incident was meant to be a threat on my life -- "a negative conditioning operant".

Was this conversation indeed meant specifically to have a psychological impact on me? Did it occur merely "to mock me" for having included the reference in my report? Who directed these persons in their actions? Was Mr. Salazar's statement meant to "plant a fear in me" to be used in some future subliminal conditioning?

Mr. Salazar's statement occurred before I realized that I have been the object of a subliminal conditioning project of the United States Government. Was his statement meant to "begin to let me know" about this project -- to begin to make me aware that subliminal conditioning can affect a person's behavior without their awareness of deliberate motivational operants -- external to themselves.

Can the C.I.A. identify certain personality types and even incite them to violence -- specific and directed -- Manchurian Candidate style? Was this indeed the cause of Mr. Lennon's death?

The conversation on September 10, 1984 could have been about something else altogether. It is a strange conversation. It was not a conversation about hotel "linen" that was dropped. I just want to locate these persons and ask them under oath whether this conversation was meant for me, and if so who directed it. I believe it is connected and that officers and agents of the United States Government were involved in making the decision "to present a conditioning operant" to me. That is why I am bringing this suit.

VI. Prayer for Relief

7. The aforesaid conduct of defendants was knowing, intentional, wilful, and in wanton and flagrant disregard of what defendant's knew or should have known to be plaintiff's civil and constitutional rights. As a result of defendants conduct, plaintiff has suffered severe and lasting emotional distress.

Wherefore, plaintiff prays for the following relief:

1. Plaintiff prays for compensatory damages of three million dollars ($3,000,000) assessed jointly and severally against defendants.

2. Plaintiff prays that the court enter judgement pursuant to 28 USC 2201, 2202 declaring the aforesaid actions of defendants to be illegal and in violation of plaintiffs constitutional and statutory rights.

Plaintiff prays for the following injunctive relief:

Defendants and others unnamed cease this project of emotional duress.

An order prohibiting defendants and others unnamed from pursuing this kind of action against any citizen or resident of the United States.

An award of reasonable attorney fees.

An award of any other cost incurred by plaintiff.

Other such relief as the court deem just, proper and equitable.

Respectfully submitted,

Michael Egger

7006 Highview Terrace #3

Hyattsville, Maryland 20782