|
Free Electricity
NOTICE: TO ALL CONCERNED Certain text files and messages contained on this site deal with activities and devices which would be in violation of various Federal, State, and local laws if actually carried out or constructed. The webmasters of this site do not advocate the breaking of any law. Our text files and message bases are for informational purposes only. We recommend that you contact your local law enforcement officials before undertaking any project based upon any information obtained from this or any other web site. We do not guarantee that any of the information contained on this system is correct, workable, or factual. We are not responsible for, nor do we assume any liability for, damages resulting from the use of any information on this site.
&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#
%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&
#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%
&%# &%#
%#& Axon Industries Present %#&
#&% #&%
&%# The Kromery Converter/Free Electricity &%#
%#& %#&
#&% Original articles by John Bedini, Eike Mueller, and Tom Bearden. #&%
&%# Retyped Without Permission 07/04/86 by (_>Shadow Hawk 1<_) &%#
%#& %#&
#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%
&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#
%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&%#&
Tom Bearden
John Bedini has a prototype free energy motor.
Imagine having a small D.C. electrical motor sitting on your laboratory bench powered by a common volt battery. Imagine starting with a fully charged battery and connecting it to the motor ihn other power input. Obviously, the motor is going to run off the battery, but by conventionalthnkngit will stop when the battery runs down.
It isn't running by the conventional wisdom of electrical physics. It isn't running by the convenal rules of electric motors and generators, but it is running.
And it isn't something complex. It's pretty simple, once one gets the hang of the basic idea.
Impossible, you say. Not at all. That's precisely what John Bedini has done, and the motor is run now in his workshop.
It's running off the principles of electromagnetics that Nikola Tesla discovered shortly ore 1900 in his Colorado Springs experiments. It's running off the fact that pure empty vacum-pre "emptiness", so to speak, is filled with rivers and oceans of seething energy, just as Nikoa esa pointed out.
It's running off the fact that vacuum space-time itself is nothing but pure masless charge. That vacuum has a very high electrostatic scalar potential - it is greatly stressed. To usefully tapteeormous locked-in energy of that stress, all one has to do is crack it sharply and tap the vauu ocilations that result. The best way to do that is to hit something resonant that is imbdde in th vacuum, then tap the resonant stress of the ringing of the vacuum itself.
In other words, we can ring something at its resonant frequency and, if that something is imbedden the vacuum, we can tap off the resonance in vacuum stress, without tapping energy directly rmte embedded system we rang into oscillation. So what we really need is something that is deepl ibede in the vacuum, that is, something that can translate the "vacuum" movement into "mass" movmen.
Well, all charged particles and ions are already imbedded in the vacuum by their charged fluxes stressed oscillations - that is, vacuum oscillations - can be converted into normal energy of ms mvement by charged particles or ions, if the system of charged particles or ions is made to esnae n phase with our tapping "potential". For our purpose, let's use a system of ions.
First we will need a big accumulator to hold a lot of the charged ions in the system that we wish hock into oscillation. We need something that has a big capacitance and also contains a lot of ios
An ordinary battery filled with electrolyte fits the bill nicely. While it's not commonly known, nary lead-acid storage batterys have a resonant ionic frequency, usually in the range of from hz. All we have to do is shock -oscillate the ions in the electrolyte at their resonant frequnc ad ime our "trigger" potential and "siphon" circuit correctly. Then if we keep adding potntil o tigger the system we can get all that "potential" to translate into "free electrical enrgy"
Look at it this way. Conventionally "electrostatic scalar potential" is composed of work or eneper columb of charged particle mass. So if we add potential alone, without the mass flow, to a sytmo oscillating charged particles, we add "physical energy" in the entire charged particle system n thr words, the "potential" we add is converted directly into "ordinary energy " by the imbeded onsin the system. And if we are clever we don't have to furnish any pushing energy to move pre ptental aound. (For proof that this is possible, see Bearden's Toward a New Electromagnetics;Part V; Vetors and Mechanisms Clarified, Tesla Book Co., 1983, Slide 19, Page 43, and the accomanyingwrite-p, pags 10, and 11. Also see Y. Aharonov and V. Bohm, "Significance of Electromagnetc Potenials inthe Quntum Theory", Physical Review, Second Series, Vol. 115, No. 3, Aug. 1, 195, pages485-491. On page490 you will find that it's possible to have a field-free reigon of sace, andstill hav the potetial determine the physical properties of the system.)
Now this "free energy resonant coupling" can be done in a simple, cheap system. You don't nbig cyclotrons and huge laboratories to do it; you can do it with ordinary D.C. motors, batterie,cnrollers and trigger circuits.
And that's exactly what John Bedini has done. It's real. It works. It's running now on John'boratory bench in prototype form.
But that's not all. John is also a humanitarian. He's as concerned as I am for that little oldow lady at the end of the lane, stretching her meager Social Security check as far as she can,sieing in the cold winter and not daring to turn up her furnace because she can't afford the rihtulutility bills.
That's simply got to change and John Bedini may well be the fellow who changes it. By openly releg his work in this paper, he is providing enough information for all the tinkerers and indpnet inventors around the world to have at it. If he can get a thousand of them to duplicate his evce i simply can't be supressed as so many others have been.
So here it is. John has deliberately written his paper for the tinkerer and experimenter, not foe scientist. You must be careful, for the device is a little tricky to adjust in and synchroniz l he resonances. You'll have to fiddle with it, but it will work. Keep at it.
Also, we warn you not to play with this unless you know what you are doing. The resonating battelectrolyte produces hydrogen, and if you hit it to hard with a "voltage spike" you can get an eletia spark inside the battery. If that happens, THE BATTERY WILL EXPLODE, so don't mess with it ules ou are qualified and use the utmost caution.
But it DOES work. So all you experimenters and pioneers, now's your chance. Have at it. Build iinker with it. Fiddle it into resonant operation. Then lets build this thing in quantity, sell i iey, and get those home utilities down to where we can all afford them - including the shiveringlitl od lady at the end of the lane.
And when we do, lets give John Bedini, and men like him the credit and appreciation they so richlyerve.
Tom Bearden
April 13,1984
John Bedini
[Note: John Bedini developed Two kinds of controller devices. One, being very simple, is the one Il present here. The other is quite a bit more complex, and would be impossible for me to reprodc ee... Anyway if you want to see the all electronic controller, get the book "Bedini's Free EnegyGeertor" by John C. Bedini, Published by the Tesla Book Co. 1580 Magnolia Ave., Millbrae, CA 403.]
For some time man has been looking for different ways to generate electricity. He has used water p, steam power, nuclear power, and solar power. Recent papers written by Tom Bearden make a fe eergy generator possible. Tom Bearden, rather than patent his devices, chose to share themwih eole who had open ears. I myself have had many conversations with Tom Bearden. He foun To tobe ne of the most reasonable men he had ever dealt with in this energy field. Most other woud tel yo stories of great machines they had, but would never present the truth with ciruit iagras or a look at the machine in question. Tom, on the other hand, clearly presents hs idea and cearly resents his ideas and discloses the concepts by means of which they work.
The facts I am about to present to you about free energy were never put into textbooks, only portionre. The textbooks have grounded people in conventional theory and made things very complicated. Wa m about to explain is very simple; anyone can understand this theory and anyone who udestnd what he is doing can build this device.
I have been grounded in conventional theory for some eleven years. I have always tried to st the simplicity of electrical circuits, but my mind wouldn't allow this because of my orthoo taining. In any event, I had to change the way i was looking at things. I started to wonder, hydoweneed to have things so complicated? The truth of the matter is, we have been taught to conumeor ast energy at every turn in our lives, so we jump into our cars, turn on lights, etc. Inothe wors, e have been conditioned to waste energy and fuels lavishly, not realizing that somday omeon will sky-rocket our energy bills to a point where we will not be able to pay for these uels. verythng will come to a stand-still. But laugh as you will, at that time Rube Goldber machins willpower yur future. It probably will not be uncommon to see machines from the size f garbag cans tothe siz of two story apartment houses powering everything in sight. These machnes will be using force innature never conceived by the conventionally trained mind of today.
The theory I am about to explain to you will bring you one step closer to gaining free energy.To begin my story I must state I had a vision - looking for this energy. Many times I hammered my a nto the ground, but I refused to give up in my search. Any person with a dream should never ltit b wasted by fools, who will always say "you can't do that". All that statement really meansistha thy do not know how to do it.
There are many different ways to explain this theory. I will discuss the first one now.
The device is very simple and uses a motor, a generator, a controller switch, and a battery. Basic, we drive a direct current motor with pulsed current from a battery, then utilize a special mean ocuse the battery to recharge itself.
First, the battery, controller, and generator are interconnected as shown in figure 3. (See also Fe 1)
/-----\ /-----\
o-12v | |===| || | 14v.o
[Motor==| |==||===Gen. ]
o+ | |===| || | .o
\-----/ Mass \-----/
Controller
Figure 1: The Kromery Converter
__________
= Brush 1
_-_ * =shaft
/xxx\ xxx=copper
/x/x\x\ = =brush
| x*x=|_________ _o--o1
\ \x/ /Brush 2 /|
\_ _/ 2o--/
-
= Brush 3 o--o3
__________ Equivelant
Circuit
Figure 2: Controller Construction
3O To controller 1O To controller
| brush #3 | brush #1
| |
| Mass | 2O To controller
| Gen. Motor| | brush #2
| ____ = ____ | |
\----O+ |-=-| +O-/ \-To batt +
/--O- |-=-| -O--+---To batt -
| ---- = ---- |
\---------------/
Figure 3: Schematic of the device
Let's begin by stating certain facts. The ions move backwards under charging
conditions and in reverse under discharging conditions. So here we start our new concept. Suppose wee constructed a machine that has tricked this battery into a different space and time relationshi.Smly put, suppose the battery never did any work and it should have its full charge left in it. upos tis becomes possible because we have stressed the terminals in such a way that the ions in te bttey eectrolyte actually move themselves backwards. The machine, or unit, that makes this possble as mny dfferent names. Some people call these units generators, energizers, alternators, etc.Convetionaly suh devices have one thing in common; they stress the battery backwards by pushing eectricty int the bttery and forcibly pushing the ions in the electrolyte backwards. In our theory we arenot goig to puh anything - the ions are going to move themselves, recharging the battery.
If we go a little deeper into this theory, you are probably asking yourself, "what is this madman tag about?" Simply put, we are going to put a stress on the battery terminals for a moment in time n h battery will do the rest. Now comes the heavy part of this theory. What they didn't teach youintetboks is that, in order for the battery to charge, two oscillatory actions must occur, one atthepostiv terminal and one at the negative terminal. Under different stress levels this then forcs th ion bacwards. The same would occur for an electron. Our machine will slingshot ions in the btteryelectolytebackwards beyond the normal recoil action.
I must give a very stern warning at this time that if the voltage developed is too high the batterll explode. Use the utmost care. Test setups in my lab have proven that this can be dangerous. Dontbild the device and experiment with it unless you know what you are doing, and use the utmost cuton
When struck by a sharp voltage spike, the electrolyte in the battery will resonate at a certain frncy and this can also force the ions backwards. Simply put, the battery, the motor, and the energzrwll become resonant at some point, "ring" like a bell when we "strike" it, and in its ringing te os eergy will be developed.
[Note: sorry I can't produce waveforms here so get the book! I will present the explanation here, hor]
The battery is really charging itself. The ions in the electrolyte are being stressed in a curved e and time relationship, the battery is actually forced into believing that no work ever occured.Teocillatory action that has taken place by the energizer has just pulsed our "slingshot" and immditey et go. Once this has happened, the electrolyte in the battery goes wild and the ions race bckwrds giing off hydrogen and oxygen gas. I must make a stern warning here! The time of the stimuaingpuls is ery important. If the time is to long the battery will burn itself out. If the pulse ime i too hort r if the circuit fails to operate correctly, the battery will never recover its chrge. Tking tis int consideration, the only failures that could occur would be the controller failre due o a poits faiure (on the electronic controller), or the multivibrator latched in the "on" osition again, oly on th electronic controller). Anyone studying this can see that we have used vry littleenergy toget to ths point, and gained a lot of resonant energy in return.
We must remember that, if the battery is applied to the energizer longer than normal, we must burnthe excess energy to keep the battery cool. The problem now becomes one of embarrassing excess ofeeg, not a shortage.
The energizer is also a simple machine, but if yu want to, you can make it very complex. The simply is to study the alternator principles. The waves we want to generate are like those that came fo l D.C. generators with the exception of armature drag, bearing drag, and no excited fields. Als, e oud want to cut the magnetic fields at 90 degress to the armature. The simpler the better.
I am going to throw a few ideas your way. I have run some tests in my lab and discovered that certtypes of energizers, generators, and alternators do what we need. Also, we want to be able to tun h utput of our energizer. The old D.C. generator puts out something very close towhat we need, ecet orThe drag.
In an A.C. generator output we are going to see just what we manufacture. It would appear that thiaves this generator out. Not really, because we can make this generator's output change by rectifigi.
In looking at the A.C. generator with rectified output, we see that it could become very useful toas an energizer, simply because it is the easiest to construct and its principles are simple. I hv oe experiments with an A.C. generator using ALL N. alligned magnets, and rectified. Most peopleca se hat that type o alternator might have some problems. However, remember that I am looking fo a ertin ype of wave form that I want to tune to a certain frequency at a certain speed. The windng o thi altrnatr is a problem and it is a bit tricky, but I chose to stay with this unit. You ma chooe a dfferet method if you retain the principle. The type of energizer that was used for the rototye was standrd office type 2-speed A.C. fan housing. The coils were replaced with 6 coils o approx 200 tuns of #0 wire - all in phase. Six permanent magnets are bonded to an aluminum disc.This arrngement s basicaly a magneto, but will produce more amperage than ordinarily expected of magneto.
Controller Construction: Figure 2 shows the controller. It should be made of two coencentric circlese with approx. 140 degrees of copper, the other, spaced far enough from the first for a brush to eisrted between them, a full 360 degrees of copper. Provisions should be made to rotate the brushs n eltionship to each other in order to secure the required timing.
Eike Mueller
John Bedini found that the material generally available concerning Kromery's Converter had been red. Rebuilding the Kromery Converter from the patent papers ended up in a non-functioning dvc. Bedini found the necessary modifications which made this machine perform.
Our first goal was to determine the converters efficiency. We found this to be quite diffi as the efficiency changes with the load applied.
Figure K-1 shows the first setup we used. We drove the Kromery Converter from a 12v motorcycattery. We connected at the output of the converter a condenser and a rectifier bridge n aallel. The rectified current was then put back into the motorcycle battery. To detect nycuret flow, we connect into the positive line a 12 V light bulb.
The result of this test was the light bulb was lit up. However after 15 minutes the batrery voltage dropped from 11.05 V to 9.10 V. The speed of the converter was stabale at 1020 rpm.
/----------\ /----\ /--O Krom+O----+--O+12v| |/-OConverter-O---+---O- | FIGURE K - 1 || \----------/ || \----/ || || | /-----------/| KROMERY CONVERTER |\-------. | | | / \ | | | /FW \ | TEST SETUP #1 | \-Bridg+--(X)-/ | \ / Bulb | \ / \--------.
In the next test we introduced a seperate battery (battery #2) for charging from the convertere recharged the battery #2 from 12.30 V to 12.40 V within 4 minutes, and we measured a current f nto the battery #2 of 0.8 amperes.
/----------\ /----\ /--O Krom+O-------O+12v| |/-OConverter-O-------O-#1 | FIGURE K - 2 || \----------/ \----/ || | /------------\ /----\ KROMERY CONVERTER |\-------. \--O12*| | | / \ /--O+#2 | | | /FW \ | \----/ TEST SETUP #2 | \-Bridg+--(/)-/ | \ / mpere *Note dfference | \ / Meter in poarity frm \--------. battery #1. Figue K-2 shws the scond test setup. Because the kromery converter ran too slow on one 12 battery, e decided t drive the onverter using 24 V via two 12 V batteries, connected in serie.
Next we wanted to find a correlation between the normal charging of battery #2 using a commercial ery charger, and charging this same battery with the Kromery converter. We drained the battery #2t , connected it to the Kromery Converter, and after reaching 11.51 V, we measured the time it toktochrge the battery from this voltage level of 11.51 V to 12.45 V. We reached this voltage (1245 ) ater11 minutes. The indicated current into the battery was 0.94 A.
We then repeated these steps using the commercial battery charger. Because we ran out of time afnearly 2 hours, we disconnected the battery from the charger. The battery voltage had reached1.1V. The measurement is depicted in Figure K-3.
THE BATTERY CHARGER NEEDED 119 MINUTES
TO RAISE THE BATTERY VOLTAGE FROM 11.51 V TO 12.41 V FIGURE K - 3
THE KROMERY CONVERTER NEEDED 11 MINUTES
TO RAISE THE BATTERY VOLTAGE FROM 11.51 V TO 12.45 V
NOTE: The charger could not fill up the batteries
to 12.45 volts within two hours.
We wanted to find a correction factor for the Kromery Converter by comparing the same effect, i the charging of the same battery from one specific voltage to another specific voltage. The acltion of this factor is avilable in the book "Experiments with a Kromery and a Brandt-Tesla covete bilt by John Bedini" By Eike Mueller, with Comments by Tom Bearden. Table K-1 shows the comine tet rsults. Because we detected an increase in the speed of the Kromery Converter as wel as deceasein the input energy when we increased the output load, we decided to measure th inpu enery andspeed when the output was shorted. Again, the input energy dropped and the speed ncreasd.
Measurement No Load Loaded With Shorted Corrected
Battery Fact. 5.535
============================================================
Input Voltage 25.30 25.00 24.90
Input Current 3.90 3.00 2.20
------------------------------------------------------------
Watts In 98.67 75.00 54.78
Watts Out N/A 10.26 N/A 56.78
------------------------------------------------------------
Speed In Rev/Sec 40.00 65.00 73.00
Output Voltage DC 48.00 10.80 N/A
Output Current N/A 0.95 1.05 --------------------------------------------------------
Watts In/Out N/A 7.31 N/A 1.32
============================================================
Table K - 1
Using the earlier determined correction factor of 5.535 we calculated the energy they put into battery to 56.78 watts (from 10.26 * 5.535). Looking at Table K-1 we see that it takes only 547 ats to run the Kromery Converter when the output is shorted. This result led us to continue it teee tests and load the converter output even more. The results of these tests can be seen in abl K-.
Here again, we detected that we would get a higher efficiency of the total device, the more load down the output side. This effect is totally contradictory to the conventional laws ofpyis.
Measurement No Load Loaded With Loaded w/ Loaded w/
Lamp & Batt 13.5 Ohms 0.63 Ohms
============================================================
Input Voltage 25.40 25.30 20.00 21.90
Input Current 3.90 3.90 3.39 2.30
------------------------------------------------------------
Watts In 99.06 98.67 67.80 50.37
Watts Out N/A 21.00 185.19 634.92
Watts Out (Corrected) 116.24 ---------------------------------------------------------- Resistance (Ohms) N/A N/A 13.50 0.63
Output Voltage DC 48.00 28.00 50.00 20.00
Output Current N/A 0.75 N/A N/A
------------------------------------------------------------
Watts In/Out N/A 0.85 0.37 0.08
============================================================
Table K - 2
We used the Kromery correction factor for the First case, when we had connected the battery to the erter output. We did not use this factor in both other cases when we used resistors in the outpu icit.
The above test results show that the efficiency of the Kromery Converter is well above 100%.
The end. Typed by (_>Shadow Hawk 1<_). May be distributed anywhere as long as you keep the credits. nt give a shit what you do with it either.
|
|
