|
Federal Reserve Notes, Interest, and the National Debt
by Edward Flaherty
NOTICE: TO ALL CONCERNED Certain text files and messages contained on this site deal with activities and devices which would be in violation of various Federal, State, and local laws if actually carried out or constructed. The webmasters of this site do not advocate the breaking of any law. Our text files and message bases are for informational purposes only. We recommend that you contact your local law enforcement officials before undertaking any project based upon any information obtained from this or any other web site. We do not guarantee that any of the information contained on this system is correct, workable, or factual. We are not responsible for, nor do we assume any liability for, damages resulting from the use of any information on this site.
Federal Reserve Notes, Interest, and the National Debt
by
Dr. Edward Flaherty
University of Charleston
July 18, 1997
How does currency enter our economy? This is a common question
that any curious citizen will eventually ask. Depending on whom
they ask, they could get an alarming answer. Some groups claim
that the Treasury prints the currency, sells it to the Federal Reserve
at tiny fraction of its face value, and that the Fed then buys
Treasury bonds with the money -- bonds for which the Treasury
must then make interest payments. In effect, then, the federal
government is paying interest on its currency to the Federal Reserve
system. Conspiracy theorists believe this is part of the New World
Order plot to bankrupt the United States. What is the truth here?
Does the government, that is, do we really pay interest on our own
currency?
Thomas Schauf of FED-UP circulates an information letter in
which he writes:
Why pay interest on our currency? A typical incorrect answer is -
the FED profits are returned to the U.S. Treasury. The truth is, the
FED is a private bank in business for profit. We pay roughly $300
billion in interest on our artificial debt and by special agreement,
the U.S. Treasury receives $20 billion in return. Taxpayers lose
$280 billion to the FED banking system per year ... Your local
library has these dollar figures. The numbers don't lie.
Schauf also argues that the Federal Reserve system is part of the
international banking conspiracy, and that President Kennedy
might have been assassinated because he allegedly attempted to
curb the power of the Federal Reserve ( both of these topics are
covered in other essays on my Fed Conspiracy Myth page ). The
currency interest issue is also raised by other conspiracy theorists.
Television evangelist Pat Robertson in his book The New World
Order and Jacques Jaikaran in Debt Virus make identical claims, as
do several on-line organizations such as the Coalition to Reform
Money and Citizens for a Better Government. How accurate are
these claims?
Some of Schauf's statement is correct. The Treasury Department
prints U.S. currency and then sells it to the Federal Reserve system
for an average cost of about 4 cents per bill. However, the Fed must
present as collateral for the currency an amount of Treasury
securities that is equivalent in value to the currency purchased. The
Federal Reserve collects interest on all the Treasury securities it
owns, including the ones held as collateral. But this is as far into
the realm of fact as Schauf's statement can take his reader. (For
more on how currency enters the economy, see the New York
Federal Reserve site)
What Schauf does not tell his reader is that nearly all the Federal
Reserve's net earnings must be paid to the Treasury. This is done
per an agreement between the Board of Governors and the Treasury.
In fact, Schauf goes as far as to say that this is incorrect. Schauf
seems to make two mistakes that lead him to an erroneous
conclusion. First, he seems to believe that all the outstanding
Treasury securities -- the national debt -- are held by the Federal
Reserve. This is not true. About 7.5 percent of Treasury bonds,
$391 billion as of September 1996, are owned by the Federal
Reserve. As shown below, the Fed receives only about $20 billion
of the Treasury's interest payments, with the remainder paid to
those who own the other 92.5 percent of the Treasury's bonds.
Second, he seems to believe that the Treasury only receives a fixed
amount of the Fed's annual net earnings. In reality, the Treasury
gets about 94 percent of the net earnings, which frequently yields a
payment in excess of $20 billion to the Treasury.
These two errors lead Schauf to assert that the Treasury is paying
the Federal Reserve about $280 billion each year in net interest
payments. This is totally wrong. Let's examine the abbreviated
income statements for the Federal Reserve system, audited by Price
Waterhouse, for 1994 and 1995 (figures are in billions).
1994 1995
Income: ---------------
Interest on Treasury Securities $19.2 $23.8
Other Income 2.3 1.6
---------------
TOTAL INCOME 21.5 25.4
Payments to U.S. Treasury $20.5 $23.4
Source: Annual Report, 1995, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
For the two years combined the Federal Reserve collected $43
billion in interest on its holdings of Treasury securities. The Fed
also repaid $43.9 billion to the Treasury. Since 1980 the Fed has
collected $255 billion in interest from the Treasury, but has repaid
a total of $267 billion.
Clearly, the Treasury is not paying any net interest on the bonds
held by the Fed, and is therefore not paying any net interest on
Federal Reserve Notes. In fact, the Treasury usually profits from
this arrangement. Indeed, Mr. Schauf, the numbers do not lie.
Schauf and other similar conspiracy theorists believe that the
Treasury ought to issue its own currency in the form of United
States Notes, a form of currency issued on a few occasions in the
past (there are still some in circulation, although the total amount is
limited by law) . This, Schauf, argues, would be an interest-free
form of currency. However, clearly there is no functional difference
between U.S. Notes and the Federal Reserve notes we now use.
Neither impose a net interest burden on the Treasury. The key
difference is who controls the issuance of the currency. The
publicly-appointed Board of Governors now controls the emissions
of Federal Reserve notes, and can make monetary policy decisions
independent of political pressure. U.S. Notes, on the other hand,
are controlled by the Treasury Department, an arm of the executive
branch and a purely political entity. Monetary policy, in my view,
ought to be based on the needs of the economy, not on the needs of
current incumbent political party.
Another implication of the arrangement between the Federal
Reserve and the government is that the bonds held by the Fed are,
in effect, interest-free loans to the federal government. As far as the
Treasury is concerned, the more bonds held by the Fed, the better,
as it reduces the Treasury's net interest burden. In fact, bonds held
by the Fed are the equivalent of literally printing money and
spending it into the economy. This is because the bonds are
interest-free and may be refinanced by the Fed indefinitely. Rather
than a loan, most people would call that a gift.
Like the other Fed conspiracy myths, this one has also proven to be
false. The federal government does not pay any net interest on the
Federal Reserve notes that serve as our currency. The key error of
the conspiracy myth-makers, or errorists, is their failure to
recognize that the Fed's annual payment to the Treasury almost
always equals or exceeds the interest the Treasury pays to the Fed.
But such sloppy research, factual errors, and fabrications are par
for the course in the world of the Federal Reserve conspiracy
theorist.
|
|